Case study: Gumlet turned ChatGPT mentions into 20% of inbound revenue. Read it →
7 Best AI Search Agencies for Healthtech SaaS (2026)
Healthtech buyers build vendor shortlists in AI answers. These 7 agencies sell AI search to health software companies, compared on the proof, prices and terms they publish.
Last updated: November 4, 2026. Pricing, terms, services and results checked on each agency’s own website.
The best AI search agencies for healthtech SaaS in 2026 are DerivateX, Breaking B2B, GrowPad, Digital Elevator, Virayo, LoudFace and Growtika. Pick by proof and fit: GrowPad and Breaking B2B publish the clearest healthtech results from AI search, Virayo and Digital Elevator have the longest healthcare client lists, and DerivateX fits $5M to $50M ARR SaaS that want Google and five AI engines run as one program from $5,000 a month. LoudFace and Growtika focus on the buying committee and compliance content that health system buyers read before they sign.
Healthtech is a hard category for AI search. Hospital CIOs, clinical leads, security reviewers and procurement teams all research separately, health topics are held to a higher trust bar, and a wrong answer about your compliance posture can knock you off a shortlist. Most “healthcare SEO agency” lists mix in clinic and patient-acquisition agencies, which solve a different problem. This guide compares seven agencies that sell AI search work to health software companies, using only what each agency publishes about itself: healthtech proof, AI engines tracked, starting price and terms.
Key takeaways
- Only three of the seven publish a health-related result from AI search: GrowPad (Edenlab AI brand coverage from about 5% to 34% to 36% in one quarter), Breaking B2B (VerifyTreatment demos from 5 to 32 a month, with buyers citing ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews) and Digital Elevator (a 1,182% increase in LLM sessions for biotech brand Halo Labs).
- Five publish a starting price. Breaking B2B starts at $4,600 a month on a 12-month term, Digital Elevator and LoudFace at $5,000, DerivateX at $5,000 plus a $1,000 to $1,200 placement budget, and Virayo at $7,500. GrowPad and Growtika do not publish prices.
- DerivateX tracks the widest set of surfaces (Google, AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude) and offers a 90-day pilot, but has no published healthtech case study yet.
- Clinic patient acquisition is a different job. Every agency here publishes a healthcare page aimed at health software or B2B health companies.
- Before you sign, ask who reviews clinical claims, how analytics handle protected health information, and which buyer-role prompts get tracked.

How were these healthtech AI search agencies compared?
Each agency was scored on what it publishes, not on what it claims in a sales call. The shortlist started with the agencies that appear on page one of Google for “best AI visibility agency for healthtech companies” and related searches such as “GEO agency for healthtech” and “healthtech SEO agency”. It was then filtered to agencies with a dedicated healthcare or healthtech page aimed at software or B2B health companies.
Every agency, including DerivateX, was checked against the same five questions. Does it have a healthtech page, a named health client with results, a published AI-search result in health, a published price, and a list of the AI engines it tracks? Anything not found on the agency’s own pages is marked “not published” rather than estimated.

What makes AI search different for healthtech SaaS?
Healthtech buyers use AI engines to build vendor shortlists, but the deal is decided by several people who each ask different questions. That changes what an agency has to build, and it is why a generic SaaS program often falls short here.
The buyer is a committee, not a patient
LoudFace puts it plainly on its healthcare page: the CIO, CMIO, security reviewer and procurement lead “all have a veto.” Each role searches for different things, from workflow fit and EHR integration to data handling and payback. An agency should map prompts and pages to each role, not write one product page for everyone.
Compliance content is sales content
Security reviewers read your public pages long before a contract. If how you handle protected health information (PHI), whether you sign a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) and your certification posture live only in gated PDFs, neither the reviewer nor an AI engine can find them. LoudFace, Growtika and Breaking B2B all describe making this content indexable as part of their healthcare work.
Health topics face a higher trust bar
Google treats health content as “Your Money or Your Life” and holds it to tighter E-E-A-T standards. Breaking B2B builds clinical reviewer credits into its pages, and Virayo describes subject matter review and quality gates. AI engines lean on the same trusted sources, which in healthtech include trade press, review grids such as G2 and Capterra, and integration directories.
Software SEO is not clinic SEO
Most results for “healthcare SEO agency” sell local map packs and patient reviews. That is a real craft, and it does not help a company selling a platform into a health system. Every agency on this list publishes a healthcare page aimed at health software or B2B health companies, which is the filter that matters.
1. DerivateX: Best for $5M to $50M ARR Healthtech SaaS That Want Google and AI Search as One Program

DerivateX is a full-service SEO and GEO agency for B2B SaaS. It is a founder-led team based in Bengaluru, founded in January 2024 by Apoorv Sharma and Shivanshi Bhatia, and it works with software companies between $5M and $50M ARR, from Series A to Series C. One team covers Google, Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, and reports against pipeline rather than rankings.
For healthtech, DerivateX is a SaaS specialist rather than a health specialist. It has a healthtech SaaS page, but no published healthtech case study yet, so its proof comes from other B2B software categories. It fits health software companies that sell like SaaS, with a product, a defined buyer and published positioning, and want one accountable team for search and AI answers.
Services
- Prompt and query mapping, technical SEO (schema, site architecture, crawlability and llms.txt) and commercial pages.
- Comparison and alternatives pages, third-party placements and digital PR, and entity consistency work.
- Citation tracking across all six surfaces, with competitor displacement tracking from the $8,000 tier.
- Pipeline attribution, from AI-referred sessions to demo requests and, on the top tier, closed revenue.
B2B SaaS proof (not healthtech)
- REsimpli became the most cited and recommended real estate CRM for investors in ChatGPT within 90 days.
- Gumlet traced close to 20% of inbound revenue to AI discovery, and the first ChatGPT-referred demo came about 12 weeks after kickoff.
- Verito grew from about 932 average monthly Google clicks to a peak of 2,775 in February 2026, with average position moving from 47.4 to 9.9.
Pricing and terms
DerivateX pricing has three published tiers. Rank and Get Found is $5,000 a month plus a $1,000 to $1,200 off-site placement budget, so about $6,000 to $6,200 all in. Own Your Category is $8,000 plus $1,500 to $2,000 (about $9,500 to $10,000), and Market Leader is $12,000 plus $2,000 to $3,000 (about $14,000 to $15,000). The first two start as a 90-day pilot with no lock-in after it; Market Leader has a 6-month minimum. A $3,500 two-week diagnostic credits in full against month one if you convert within 30 days.
Pros
- Published pricing, including the placement budget most agencies leave out.
- Tracks six surfaces, the widest set on this list.
- 90-day pilot with no lock-in after it on the first two tiers.
- SaaS only, so positioning, pricing pages and comparison content are core work.
Cons
- No published healthtech case study yet.
- Turns down regulated categories where compliance constraints make citation-oriented content unworkable.
- No published clinical review process for health content.
- Not a fit under $5M ARR or for teams expecting results in under 90 days.
Best for: Series A to C health software companies between $5M and $50M ARR that want Google and AI search run by one team, tied to pipeline.
Skip it if: You need an agency with named healthtech wins, or clinical review built into the service.
2. Breaking B2B: Best for Clinical-Review Content and Healthcare Trade Press

Breaking B2B is a senior-led SEO, GEO and AEO agency that works with B2B and SaaS companies only. Its healthtech page targets digital health, telehealth, EHR and EMR vendors, clinical workflow tools and B2B health platforms, and says it serves 50+ companies overall.
Healthtech focus
- Keyword research built around procurement, clinician and payer queries, pulled from closed-won deals, sales calls and RFP language.
- Pages with clinical reviewer credits, peer-reviewed sources and medical schema.
- HIPAA-aware analytics: its FAQ describes server-side tracking where possible, no PHI in URLs or events, and tools with a BAA available.
- Outreach to healthcare trade press, naming Becker’s, Fierce Healthcare, MobiHealthNews and HIStalk.
Healthtech proof
VerifyTreatment, which handles benefits verification for behavioral health providers, went from 5 to 6 demos a month in October to 32 in February and 29 in March, with first demos inside 30 days. Its Director of Marketing, Luis Perdomo, says buyers now answer “ChatGPT” and “Google AI Overview” when asked how they found the company.
Pricing and terms
Breaking B2B publishes a pricing page. A Light plan starts at $4,600 a month on a 12-month term. Silver is $6,500 a month on a 6-month term or $6,000 on 12 months, and higher tiers run $8,000 to $9,500. Its healthtech page notes that average spend for a fast-growth program is $7,000+ a month.
Pros
- The most detailed healthtech playbook on this list, including clinical review and trade press.
- A named health software client with demo numbers and AI discovery in the quote.
- Published prices for every tier.
Cons
- 6- or 12-month terms; the lowest price needs a 12-month commitment.
- Names ChatGPT, Perplexity and AI Overviews, but not Gemini or Claude.
- The VerifyTreatment result is measured in demos, not AI citation share.
Best for: Digital health and EHR vendors that need content to pass clinical review and want links from healthcare trade press.
Skip it if: You want a short pilot before a 6- or 12-month term.
3. GrowPad: Best for Interoperability, FHIR and Health Data Software

GrowPad is a B2B SEO and GEO agency, founded in 2020, with a dedicated practice for healthtech, medtech and healthcare IT. It works with healthtech SaaS, healthcare software development firms and B2B healthcare IT services, and says it is not a fit for pre-product companies or anyone expecting significant results within 60 days.
Healthtech focus
- Its Trajectory method starts with the commercial queries closest to a buying decision, then expands.
- AI-citation outreach to the sources ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews already cite in your category, with placements approved before they go live.
- Bi-weekly Loom updates, monthly reports and quarterly business reviews that track demos, SQLs and AI visibility.
Healthtech proof
- Edenlab (FHIR data platforms and healthcare analytics): AI brand coverage grew from about 5% to 34% to 36% in Q1 2026, visible in 22 of 27 tracked prompts. GrowPad notes this came after building SEO from scratch from May 2025, and that Edenlab still had no presence in Bing and Copilot answers that quarter.
- TATEEDA Global (healthcare software development): organic traffic grew from 500 to 10,000+ monthly visitors, with 4 to 5 MQLs and 1 to 2 SQLs a month from organic.
- Kodjin (FHIR server product): monthly SQLs from organic went from zero to 5+, per GrowPad’s healthcare page.
Pricing and terms
GrowPad does not publish prices or contract terms on its site. It mentions Starter, Growth and Accelerate packages, so ask for the scope and minimum term of each in writing.
Pros
- The clearest published AI-visibility result for a health software company on this list.
- Honest case study detail, including the engines where the client is still missing.
- Deep focus on interoperability and health data categories.
Cons
- No published pricing or terms.
- Names ChatGPT, Gemini and AI Overviews, not Perplexity or Claude.
- The Edenlab gain followed SEO groundwork that began in May 2025, so expect a longer runway.
Best for: Health data, interoperability and healthcare software companies that want proof of AI citation gains in a similar category.
Skip it if: You need a published price before the first call, or results inside 60 days.
4. Digital Elevator: Best for Healthcare IT Vendors That Want a Scoped AI Visibility Sprint

Digital Elevator is an SEO and AI visibility agency that has operated since 2010. Its healthcare page covers multi-location health systems, healthcare IT and digital health vendors, and it sells both a scoped AI Visibility program and an ongoing managed AEO and SEO retainer.
Healthtech focus
- AI Visibility sprints that target one specific citation gap across structure, authority and off-site presence.
- Off-site work on brand mentions, Reddit and earned media, plus on-site fixes.
- A free AI Visibility Report for qualified teams as the entry point.
One caveat from its own FAQ: “Compliance-heavy work is generally not the best fit for our program model.” If your category needs heavy regulatory review on every page, raise that on the first call.
Healthcare proof
- DuvaSawko (emergency medicine coding, billing and revenue cycle management): 732% more organic traffic, 700% more conversions and #1 Google results for “emergency medicine revenue cycle management” and “ER billing software”.
- Halo Labs (biotech instruments, later acquired by Waters): a 1,182% increase in LLM sessions and 60% higher traffic value.
- Ventra Health (healthcare IT) is listed as a managed AEO and SEO client, and a McKesson BPS marketing director is quoted on the site.
Pricing and terms
Published starting points: AI Visibility sprints from $3,500 (a full three-pillar program typically runs $21,000 to $25,000+), AI Visibility Mentions from $3,495 a month over a 90-day program, and Managed AEO and SEO from $5,000 a month. The managed program has a 4-month minimum, then runs month-to-month with 30 days’ notice and no early-termination fee.
Pros
- Clear published prices and exit terms.
- Long healthcare IT client history.
- A one-off sprint lets you test before a retainer.
Cons
- Says compliance-heavy work is generally not a fit.
- The strongest AI-search number is from a biotech brand, not health software.
- Names ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews in its reporting, fewer engines than most here.
Best for: Healthcare IT vendors and revenue cycle companies that want to test AI visibility with a scoped sprint before a retainer.
Skip it if: Your content needs heavy compliance or clinical review on every page.
5. Virayo: Best for Care Training, Workforce and Post-Acute Care Platforms

Virayo is a B2B SaaS SEO, GEO and PPC agency. Its healthcare page is unusually specific: care training, workforce, digital health and care experience platforms, mostly selling into long-term and post-acute care.
Healthtech focus
- GEO work aimed at the sources LLMs pull from in care software: senior care and home care trade press, industry associations, G2 and Capterra grids, and review content.
- Monitoring how LLMs describe your product, pricing and compliance coverage, and correcting the record where it drifts.
- Subject matter review and quality gates on health-adjacent content.
Healthcare proof
- CareAcademy (online caregiver training): #1 rankings for terms such as “online caregiver training” and “home care training programs”, nearly doubled organic traffic, and organic became its top source of new pipeline.
- Aprima (EHR, revenue cycle and practice management): monthly PPC leads grew 33x after a paid search rebuild, paired with technical SEO.
Virayo does not publish an AI-citation result for a healthcare client yet; its healthcare proof is Google rankings, pipeline and paid leads.
Pricing and terms
Virayo publishes its floor: combined SEO and GEO starts at $7,500 a month, with an initial six-month term and then month-to-month.
Pros
- Named healthcare software clients with pipeline outcomes.
- Clear published minimum and month-to-month terms after the first six months.
- Also runs paid search if you want one partner for both.
Cons
- Highest published entry price on this list.
- No published AI-search result in healthcare yet.
- Narrowest healthcare focus: strongest in care and workforce software.
Best for: Care training, workforce and post-acute care platforms that want SEO, GEO and paid search from one SaaS specialist.
Skip it if: Your budget is under $7,500 a month or you sell to acute care health systems.
6. LoudFace: Best for Buying-Committee Pages and Webflow Health Sites

LoudFace is a B2B SaaS growth agency that combines GEO, SEO, AEO, conversion work and Webflow design. Its healthcare page is explicit about scope: “For health-tech software companies, not medical practices.”
Healthtech focus
- A page for each role that can block a deal: workflow fit for the clinical lead, integration detail for the CIO, data handling and BAA posture for security, payback for finance.
- Moving security and privacy answers out of gated PDFs onto indexable pages.
- Tracking ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews per buyer question, with cited sources re-measured every 30 days.
Healthcare proof
Dimer Health, a telehealth company, saw a 288% increase in conversions after a rebrand and Webflow migration. LoudFace’s published AI-visibility gains come from other verticals, such as fintech, rather than healthcare.
Pricing and terms
LoudFace publishes that engagements start from $5,000 a month, scoped on the intro call. Fixed-scope work runs inside a retainer with a 3-month minimum.
Pros
- The sharpest buying-committee framing among the seven.
- Strong design and conversion work alongside search.
- Published starting price and a short minimum.
Cons
- Healthcare proof is a conversion and rebrand result, not AI search.
- Tracks three AI surfaces, not Gemini or Claude.
- Short healthcare list: one telehealth client and the Institute of Medical Physics.
Best for: Health software companies that need role-based pages and indexable compliance content, often alongside a site redesign.
Skip it if: You want published healthcare AI-citation results before you sign.
7. Growtika: Best for Healthcare IT Selling Into EHR Ecosystems

Growtika is an SEO, AI search and go-to-market agency, founded in 2019, for B2B SaaS, cybersecurity, infrastructure and developer-first companies. Its healthcare page targets healthcare IT vendors that compete with Epic, Cerner and other incumbents in AI answers.
Healthtech focus
- A healthcare AI visibility audit across 500+ healthcare tech queries, covering EHR, telehealth, clinical workflow and patient engagement.
- HIPAA-aware content strategy: compliance frameworks, SOC 2 content and certification pages structured for AI extraction.
- Integration citation signals from the Epic marketplace, Cerner directory and AWS HealthLake ecosystem, plus clinical outcome framing.
- Weekly citation reports across ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity.
Healthcare proof
The healthcare page shows 31K+ views from a medical codes content cluster and #1 rankings for CPT and ICD code terms, but does not name the client. Its named testimonials come from B2B software companies such as Agora, Groundcover, Checkly and Apono.
Pricing and terms
Growtika does not publish prices or terms.
Pros
- Strong technical and structured-data approach for AI extraction.
- Specific plan for EHR ecosystem and integration-directory presence.
- Named testimonials from B2B software marketing leaders at Agora, Groundcover, Checkly and Apono.
Cons
- No named healthcare client.
- No published pricing or terms.
- Its healthcare page includes a line about appearing in ChatGPT recommendations within 60 days, which is worth testing against references.
Best for: Healthcare IT vendors whose shortlist depends on EHR integrations and security posture.
Skip it if: You need named healthtech references or a published price.
How do the 7 healthtech AI search agencies compare?
Breaking B2B and GrowPad have the most health-specific AI proof, Digital Elevator and Virayo the longest healthcare client history, and DerivateX the widest engine coverage. The table puts the published facts side by side.
| Agency | Healthtech proof published | AI engines named | Starting price | Terms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DerivateX | None yet (B2B SaaS proof only) | Google, AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude | $5,000/mo + $1,000 to $1,200 placement | 90-day pilot, then no lock-in |
| Breaking B2B | VerifyTreatment: 5 to 32 demos a month | ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews | $4,600/mo (Light) | 6 or 12 months |
| GrowPad | Edenlab: AI brand coverage ~5% to 34-36% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overviews | Not published | Not published |
| Digital Elevator | DuvaSawko: 732% organic traffic | ChatGPT, AI Overviews | $3,500 sprint; $5,000/mo managed | 4-month minimum, then monthly |
| Virayo | CareAcademy: #1 rankings, top pipeline source | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini | $7,500/mo | 6 months, then monthly |
| LoudFace | Dimer Health: 288% conversions | ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews | $5,000/mo | 3-month minimum (fixed scope) |
| Growtika | Unnamed medical codes cluster | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity | Not published | Not published |
Which healthtech AI search agencies publish their pricing?
Five of the seven publish a starting price. Breaking B2B starts lowest at $4,600 a month on a 12-month term, Digital Elevator and LoudFace start at $5,000, DerivateX at $5,000 plus a placement budget (about $6,000 to $6,200 all in), and Virayo at $7,500. GrowPad and Growtika do not publish prices. For a wider view, see which GEO agencies disclose pricing.

How do you choose an AI search agency for healthtech SaaS?
Start with your product category and your review process, then match proof and budget. An interoperability platform, a care workforce tool and a telehealth company have different buyers and different sources that AI engines trust.
| If your main need is… | Look first at |
|---|---|
| Proof of AI citation gains for health data or interoperability software | GrowPad |
| Clinical-review content and healthcare trade press links | Breaking B2B |
| A scoped test before a retainer | Digital Elevator (sprint), DerivateX (90-day pilot) |
| Care training, workforce or post-acute care software | Virayo |
| Role-based pages and a site rebuild | LoudFace |
| EHR ecosystem and integration-directory presence | Growtika |
| Google plus five AI engines, tied to pipeline, at $5M to $50M ARR | DerivateX |
What should you ask on every discovery call?
- Which health software clients have you worked with, and what changed in AI answers, not only in Google?
- Which prompts will you track for each buyer role: clinical lead, CIO, security and procurement?
- Who reviews clinical and compliance claims before anything is published, and how long does that add?
- How will analytics avoid collecting PHI, and do any tools in the stack need a BAA?
- What is the full cost of the first 90 days, including placement or link budgets, and what are the exit terms?
For more on vertical buying, see the best GEO agencies for fintech SaaS and best GEO agencies for HR tech SaaS, and for video software, the best GEO agencies for video and media SaaS. For a head-to-head that includes Breaking B2B, read Backstage SEO vs Breaking B2B vs DerivateX.
Which other agencies were considered?
Several agencies publish healthtech GEO pages but did not make the seven because their health proof could not be verified on their own sites.
- 95 Projects publishes a GEO-for-healthtech page and its own healthtech agency list, but the health-related case study on its site is a consumer electrolyte brand, not health software.
- Passionfruit has a page for healthcare software SEO and GEO, but its healthcare examples are illustrative rather than named client results.
- Generalist B2B SaaS agencies such as Omniscient Digital or SimpleTiger can run AI search for health software, but do not publish healthtech-specific programs.
AI Search Agencies for Healthtech SaaS FAQs
What is the best AI search agency for healthtech SaaS?
It depends on your category and budget. GrowPad publishes the clearest AI-visibility result for a health software company, Breaking B2B has the most detailed clinical-review and trade press process, and DerivateX fits $5M to $50M ARR SaaS that want Google and five AI engines run as one program from $5,000 a month.
How much does an AI search agency for healthtech cost?
Published starting prices range from $4,600 a month (Breaking B2B Light, 12-month term) to $7,500 a month (Virayo SEO and GEO). Digital Elevator and LoudFace start at $5,000, and DerivateX at $5,000 plus a $1,000 to $1,200 placement budget. GrowPad and Growtika do not publish prices.
Is GEO compatible with HIPAA?
GEO works on public content such as product, integration and compliance pages, so it should not involve protected health information. The risk sits in analytics and tracking. Ask the agency how it keeps PHI out of URLs and events, and whether any tool in the stack needs a BAA.
What is the difference between healthcare SEO and healthtech SEO?
Healthcare SEO usually means patient acquisition for clinics and hospitals: local search, reviews and location pages. Healthtech SEO and GEO sell software to health organizations, so the work targets buying committees, integrations, compliance content and vendor shortlists in AI answers.
How long does AI search take to work for a healthtech company?
Published examples vary. Breaking B2B reports first demos for VerifyTreatment inside 30 days, while GrowPad’s Edenlab AI coverage gain came in Q1 2026, after SEO groundwork that began in May 2025. DerivateX treats 90 days as the minimum test period.
Why is DerivateX listed first on a list DerivateX published?
The list is ordered by fit for the most common buyer of this guide: a $5M to $50M ARR health software company that wants Google and AI search run as one program. DerivateX was held to the same published-facts standard as every agency, and its limits are listed, including no published healthtech case study yet.
The Bottom Line
The right AI search agency for a healthtech SaaS company is the one with proof in a category close to yours and a process your clinical and compliance reviewers can live with. For AI-citation proof in health data software, GrowPad. For clinical-review content and trade press, Breaking B2B. For a scoped first test, Digital Elevator. For care and workforce software, Virayo. For buying-committee pages, LoudFace. For EHR ecosystem presence, Growtika. For Google and five AI engines tied to pipeline at $5M to $50M ARR, DerivateX. Whichever you shortlist, get the 90-day cost, the review process and the exit terms in writing before you sign.
Want to see whether DerivateX fits? Book a discovery call with a founder, or start with a free AI visibility audit to see which buyer prompts name your competitors instead of you.
Related reading
- DerivateX for healthtech SaaS
- 9 best GEO agencies for fintech SaaS
- 5 best GEO agencies for HR tech SaaS
- GEO agencies that publish pricing
- DerivateX GEO agency













